Ethics in Dispute Resolution
The ethics of negotiation and mediation
are anything but clear or simple. The articles listed here are among a
growing number of writings which demonstrate why.
In addition to the documents on this
page, please see also the
CPR-Georgetown Commission
Model Rule for the Lawyer as Third Party Neutral
and
Principles for ADR Provider Organizations, products of the
CPR/Georgetown Ethics Project. The CPR/Georgetown project was the most
comprehensive effort to develop ethical principles for the field.
Christopher Honeyman was one of the commission members, and the
CPR/Georgetown project drew from and updated a number of the articles below.
Finally, please also see chapters
18-20, 53 and 67 in
The Negotiator's
Fieldbook (Schneider, A.K. &
Honeyman, C., editors; ABA, 2006.)
- Honeyman, C. (1999.) "Confidential,
more or less." Dispute Resolution Magazine (ABA), January
1999: pp. 12-13.
- Honeyman, C. and Moore, L., eds. (1995). What
Makes Mediators Squirm?
A working paper from the 1995 conference of the Public Policy and
Environmental Sector of the Society of Professionals in Dispute
Resolution.
- Honeyman, C. (1987). In
Defense of Ambiguity
Negotiation Journal 3:81-86.
- Honeyman, C. (1986). Bias and mediators'
ethics.
Negotiation Journal 2:175-178.
- Honeyman, C. (1985).
Patterns of bias in mediation.
Journal of Dispute Resolution,
vol. 1985, 141-149.
|