|
|
Christopher Honeyman This article was originally published in Negotiation Journal, January 2001. It is available here as an Adobe Acrobat (*.pdf) file. (from the Journal's description): Negotiation participants usually think of "settlement" as the official end of a conflict; the author points out that this mental image is inaccurate in many situations, where a settlement is followed by additional eruptions of conflict. He uses the recent Good Friday peace accord in Northern Ireland as an example of the continuing nature of many conflicts; theorizes as to why we have this incorrect mental image in general; and suggests ways we can present a more accurate representation of a conflict’s life cycle. What if there is a pervasive error in the mental map of negotiations that most people — the public, negotiators, even mediators — are using? I have come to believe that most of us are carrying around a mental image of what "settlement" looks like — and that it’s a distorted image.... Full article (91 KB)
|